by George Rizor
In business, industry and government today (and for the past couple decades), one of the jargon, key word phrases related to financial expenditures is ‘Return on Investments’ (ROI).
The idea is that we weigh our behaviors and decisions to determine if what we get in return for implementing a decision is adequate and valuable, worth the risk that we take and the price we pay.
Decisions . . . We are called upon to make decisions all the time. But few are as important as the decision that is outlined and offered in the Gospel when Jesus says, “For those who want to save their life will lose it, and those who lose their life for my sake will find it. For what will it profit them if they gain the whole world but forfeit their life? Or what will they give in return for their life?” (Matthew 16:25-26).
Sometimes in our attempt to develop and understand and practice our faith, we fall into a worldly paradigm of barter. What will it cost me to be saved, to know redemption?
We sometimes act as if – in the acceptance of Jesus and the desire to know and to abide by God’s will – there is an implicit trade off.
Decisions . . . And we behave as if salvation is like other decisions – buying a car, for example – that entails trade-offs – so we act like we understand the decision that Jesus poses, which entails a trade-off.
So what is the trade-off that Jesus presents? Let’s look at it for a moment. It almost sounds like a riddle. Whoever would save his life will lose it. Certainly a trade-off, but what can it possibly mean? Can you save and lose at the same time in a trade off?
Let’s look at how we approach trade-offs and Return on Investment. The most common approach is that approach that we took as kids when trading baseball cards, comic books (my personal favorite), or trading marbles. Generally, we had a pretty good idea of the value of what we were trading and what we were getting in return. We could hunker down beside the ring drawn in the dirt, and just as we were getting ready to shoot, Mikey says, “Hey! I’ll trade you this yellow cat’s eye and this blue cat’s eye for your red aggie.”
Now you know a few things. First, your aggie is worth at least three other marbles; second you know that you got it from Susie for an aggie and a dark blue shooter with a small crack, that she didn’t even notice (OK, so you kind of took her in that trade); and third, you know that Mikey really, really wants your red aggie. Well it turns out that Mikey has a couple shooters that you want, and you really have wanted that blue cat’s eye for a long time, so you are able to strike a bargain. Mikey gets the red aggie he wanted, and you get the blue cat’s eye that you want.
So you did get something, and you did lose something. You lost the red aggie. You got the blue cat’s eye. But that’s not what Jesus has said here. He speaks in the scripture of getting and losing the same thing. “Whoever would save his life will lose it.” What is He talking about saving and what is He talking about losing?